Skip to Main Content

Info

Feet of Clay Detector

(more on the origin of the metaphor)

These papers may be unreliable as they cite at least one retracted reference spotted by the Annulled Detector.

🕵️ Please post True Positives on PubPeer: the last column will link to your PubPeer comment.

🗣️ Report True/False Positives, ideas, or else using the Feedback feature.

📄 Cabanac, G. (2024). Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literature [Comment].
Nature. 632(8027), 977-979. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02747-1.

📄 Naddaf, M., Van Noorden, R. (2024). Exclusive: the papers that most heavily cite retracted studies [News].
Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-02719-5.

Figure

Last Update

⏰ Last Update: 02/11/2024 22:15

📊 View results by publisher or by year.

Feet of Clay

Navigating the citation graph...